Thoughts from Adam:
ADAM: “you have to enter the daily rate during manual goal creation” isn’t quite “death-to”, is it?
DREEV: oh, um, well i guess the thing is that “weekly rates” the way users expected that to work and the way that it would/could/will work in the bright-red-staircase world has never existed. but you’re right, it’s not death, more like pre-birth.
death to the confusing seeming-weekly rates?
ADAM: to me, changing how we re presenting a rate to a different way in one set of screens doesn’t seem “death to” anything
DREEV: [nodding-emoji] i concede this point
ADAM: we didn’t intend to support how users were interpreting it, right? so it’s not even a philosophical change, more like “this was one of the most confusing things and now we’re going to fix it”. honestly, I kinda like the concession of “let’s change it at goal creation, and then let users show themselves the rate in “per week” or “per month”, since we made them enter the daily rate already.
ADAM: I don’t have extreme confidence that “making users enter the rate as daily during goal creation means that no users will ever have issues with this”, but i think this is a great example of “what’s the smallest change that may work”.
we could have changed it on any other screen, but users might never see it there, but they have to do it during goal creation… unless they’re in the API, and we assume they know what they’re doing.
(feel free to copy and paste any of that into the blog post, or write a rebuttal )
ADAM: I still like the idea of showing “0.12” / day (about X per week, and about Y per month), but it’s likely a great idea to start with the more extreme change first here.
if we still have just as many users confused, then finetuning this is silly, and we should go find another mountain instead of the closest maxima.